Difference between revisions of "User:Helixgroup"

From Forensics Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Cryptographical File System: ===
+
''The danger in using a wiki as a collaboration tool is that other people will edit it. For examlpe, the stuff on cryptographic file systems should be on that page, not here.''
 +
 
 +
=== Cryptographic File System: ===
  
 
[http://http://www.crypto.com/papers/cfskey.pdf|Key Management in an Encrypting File System], Matt Blaze, USENIX Summer 1994 Technical Conference, Boston, MA, June 1994.
 
[http://http://www.crypto.com/papers/cfskey.pdf|Key Management in an Encrypting File System], Matt Blaze, USENIX Summer 1994 Technical Conference, Boston, MA, June 1994.
 +
 
[http://http://www.crypto.com/papers/cfs.pdf|A Cryptographic File System for Unix], Matt Blaze, Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Fairfax, VA, November 1993.
 
[http://http://www.crypto.com/papers/cfs.pdf|A Cryptographic File System for Unix], Matt Blaze, Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Fairfax, VA, November 1993.
  
Line 27: Line 30:
 
** performance
 
** performance
 
** total solution for end-users
 
** total solution for end-users
** Key management for cryptographical file system.
+
** Key management for cryptographical file system
 +
** Ease of use by end-users
  
 
[[User:Lenageraghty|Lenageraghty]] 22:48, 7 November 2005 (EST)
 
[[User:Lenageraghty|Lenageraghty]] 22:48, 7 November 2005 (EST)
 +
 +
===== comment from TA (Joe)  =====
 +
That looks like some of the right inroads.  Remember that the paper is
 +
not very long, so you may want to focus on the three systems and do a
 +
deep analysis.  Certainly some things to think about:
 +
      Simpson's lecture where he talked about it
 +
      Failure modes of such systems
 +
      Challenges in using/installing
 +
 +
[[User:Lenageraghty|Lenageraghty]] 00:15, 8 November 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 18:20, 8 November 2005

The danger in using a wiki as a collaboration tool is that other people will edit it. For examlpe, the stuff on cryptographic file systems should be on that page, not here.

Contents

Cryptographic File System:

Management in an Encrypting File System, Matt Blaze, USENIX Summer 1994 Technical Conference, Boston, MA, June 1994.

Cryptographic File System for Unix, Matt Blaze, Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Fairfax, VA, November 1993.

Lenageraghty 22:08, 7 November 2005 (EST)

Vendor's product overview:

Seagate FDE: http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/marketing/PO-Momentus-FDE.pdf

Network Appliance: http://www.netapp.com/ftp/decru-fileshredding.pdf


Lenageraghty 22:08, 7 November 2005 (EST)

Useful site:

Transparent CryptoGraphical file system: http://www.tcfs.it/index.php?pc=2

Lenageraghty 22:10, 7 November 2005 (EST)


Suggestions/Questions/Outline ?:

  • Solutions from other storage vendors.
  • Desirable features for a cryptographical file system.
    • cost
    • performance
    • total solution for end-users
    • Key management for cryptographical file system
    • Ease of use by end-users

Lenageraghty 22:48, 7 November 2005 (EST)

comment from TA (Joe)

That looks like some of the right inroads. Remember that the paper is not very long, so you may want to focus on the three systems and do a deep analysis. Certainly some things to think about:

      Simpson's lecture where he talked about it
      Failure modes of such systems
      Challenges in using/installing

Lenageraghty 00:15, 8 November 2005 (EST)