Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From ForensicsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
(44 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div style="margin-top:0.5em; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em; background-color:#faf0ff; align:right; border:1px solid #ddccff;">
 
<div style="margin-top:0.5em; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em; background-color:#faf0ff; align:right; border:1px solid #ddccff;">
 
This is the '''Forensics Wiki''', a [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ Creative Commons]-licensed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki wiki] devoted to information about [[digital forensics]] (also known as computer forensics). We currently list a total of [[Special:Allpages|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}]] pages.
 
This is the '''Forensics Wiki''', a [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ Creative Commons]-licensed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki wiki] devoted to information about [[digital forensics]] (also known as computer forensics). We currently list a total of [[Special:Allpages|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}]] pages.
+
 
Much of [[computer forensics]] is focused on the [[tools]] and [[techniques]] used by [[investigator]]s, but there are also a number of important [[papers]], [[people]], and [[organizations]] involved. Many of those organizations sponsor [[conferences]] throughout the year and around the world. You may also wish to examine the popular [[journals]] and some special [[reports]].
+
Much of [[computer forensics]] is focused on the [[tools]] and [[techniques]] used by [[investigator]]s, but there are also a number of important [[papers]], [[people]], and [[organizations]] involved. Many of those organizations sponsor [[Upcoming_events|conferences]] throughout the year and around the world. You may also wish to examine the popular [[journals]] and some special [[reports]].
</div>  
+
</div>
  
<!-- Selected Forensics Research --> 
 
  
 +
==WIKI NEWS==
 +
2013-05-15: You can now subscribe to Forensics Wiki Recent Changes with the [[ForensicsWiki FeedBurner Feed]]
 +
 +
{| width="100%"
 +
|-
 +
| width="60%" style="vertical-align:top" |
 +
<!-- Selected Forensics Research --> 
 
<div style="margin-top:0.5em; border:2px solid #ff0000; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em; background-color:#ffff99; align:center; border:1px solid #ddccff;">
 
<div style="margin-top:0.5em; border:2px solid #ff0000; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em; background-color:#ffff99; align:center; border:1px solid #ddccff;">
<h2 style="margin:0; background-color:#ffff33; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #afa3bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Selected Forensics Research</h2>
+
<h2 style="margin:0; background-color:#ffff33; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #afa3bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;"> Featured Forensic Research </h2>
  
<!-- ARTICLE GOES HERE -->
+
<small>May 2014</small>
<small>MARCH-2010</small>
+
<bibtex>
;[http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1592451.1592455 Internet geolocation: Evasion and counterevasion]
+
@inproceedings{Hurley:2013:MAC:2488388.2488444,
; ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Volume 42 Issue 1  (December 2009)
+
author = {Hurley, Ryan and Prusty, Swagatika and Soroush, Hamed and Walls, Robert J. and Albrecht, Jeannie and Cecchet, Emmanuel and Levine, Brian Neil and Liberatore, Marc and Lynn, Brian and Wolak, Janis},
<blockquote>
+
title = {Measurement and Analysis of Child Pornography Trafficking on P2P Networks},
Internet geolocation technology aims to determine the physical (geographic) location of Internet users and devices. It is currently proposed or in use for a wide variety of purposes, including targeted marketing, restricting digital content sales to authorized jurisdictions, and security applications such as reducing credit card fraud. This raises questions about the veracity of claims of accurate and reliable geolocation. We provide a survey of Internet geolocation technologies with an emphasis on adversarial contexts; that is, we consider how this technology performs against a knowledgeable adversary whose goal is to evade geolocation. We do so by examining first the limitations of existing techniques, and then, from this base, determining how best to evade existing geolocation techniques. We also consider two further geolocation techniques which may be of use even against adversarial targets: (1) the extraction of client IP addresses using functionality introduced in the 1.5 Java API, and (2) the collection of round-trip times using HTTP refreshes. These techniques illustrate that the seemingly straightforward technique of evading geolocation by relaying traffic through a proxy server (or network of proxy servers) is not as straightforward as many end-users might expect. We give a demonstration of this for users of the popular Tor anonymizing network.</blockquote>
+
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web},
 +
series = {WWW '13},
 +
year = {2013},
 +
isbn = {978-1-4503-2035-1},
 +
location = {Rio de Janeiro, Brazil},
 +
pages = {631--642},
 +
numpages = {12},
 +
url = {http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2488388.2488444},
 +
  acmid = {2488444},
 +
publisher = {International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee},
 +
address = {Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland},
 +
  keywords = {digital forensics, forensic triage},
 +
}
 +
</bibtex>
 +
Peer-to-peer networks are the most popular mechanism for the criminal acquisition and distribution of child pornography (CP). In this paper, we examine observations of peers sharing known CP on the eMule and Gnutella networks, which were collected by law enforcement using forensic tools that we developed. We characterize a year's worth of network activity and evaluate different strategies for prioritizing investigators' limited resources. The highest impact research in criminal forensics works within, and is evaluated under, the constraints and goals of investigations. We follow that principle, rather than presenting a set of isolated, exploratory characterizations of users.
  
 +
First, we focus on strategies for reducing the number of CP files available on the network by removing a minimal number of peers. We present a metric for peer removal that is more effective than simply selecting peers with the largest libraries or the most days online. Second, we characterize six aggressive peer subgroups, including: peers using Tor, peers that bridge multiple p2p networks, and the top 10% of peers contributing to file availability. We find that these subgroups are more active in their trafficking, having more known CP and more uptime, than the average peer. Finally, while in theory Tor presents a challenge to investigators, we observe that in practice offenders use Tor inconsistently. Over 90% of regular Tor users send traffic from a non-Tor IP at least once after first using Tor.
 +
(See also [[Past Selected Articles]])
  
 +
| width="40%" style="vertical-align:top" |
  
<!--END OF ARTICLE-->
+
<div style="margin-top:0.5em; border:2px solid #00ff00; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em; background-color:#ffeeff; align:center; border:1px solid #ffccff;">
 +
<h2 style="margin:0; background-color:#ffff33; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #afa3bf; text-align:left; color:#000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">  Featured Article </h2>
 +
;[[Forensic Linux Live CD issues]]
 +
:Forensic Linux Live CD distributions are widely used during computer forensic investigations. Currently, many vendors of such Live CD distributions state that their Linux do not modify the contents of hard drives or employ "write protection." Testing indicates that this may not always be the case. [[Forensic Linux Live CD issues|Read More...]]
  
 
+
|}
(Past selected articles [[Past Selected Articles|are archived here]].)
+
 
+
<!-- END OF NEWS -->
+
</div>
+
  
  
Line 56: Line 78:
 
* [[Steganography]], [[Steganalysis]]
 
* [[Steganography]], [[Steganalysis]]
 
* '''[[Metadata]]:''' [[MAC times]], [[ACLs]], [[Email Headers]], [[Exif]], [[ID3]], [[OLE-2]], ...
 
* '''[[Metadata]]:''' [[MAC times]], [[ACLs]], [[Email Headers]], [[Exif]], [[ID3]], [[OLE-2]], ...
 +
* '''[[Legal issues]]:''' [[Caselaw|Case law]]
 
* '''Further information:''' [[Books]], [[Papers]], [[Reports]], [[Journals]], [[Websites]], [[Blogs]], [[Mailing lists]], [[Organizations]], [[Vendors]], [[Conferences]]
 
* '''Further information:''' [[Books]], [[Papers]], [[Reports]], [[Journals]], [[Websites]], [[Blogs]], [[Mailing lists]], [[Organizations]], [[Vendors]], [[Conferences]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 72: Line 95:
 
* '''[[Tools#Disk_Analysis_Tools|Disk Analysis]]''': [[EnCase]], [[SMART]], [[Sleuthkit]], [[foremost]], [[Scalpel]], [[frag_find]]...
 
* '''[[Tools#Disk_Analysis_Tools|Disk Analysis]]''': [[EnCase]], [[SMART]], [[Sleuthkit]], [[foremost]], [[Scalpel]], [[frag_find]]...
 
* '''[[Tools#Forensics_Live_CDs|Live CDs]]''': [[DEFT Linux]], [[Helix]] ([[Helix3 Pro|Pro]]), [[FCCU Gnu/Linux Boot CD]], [[Knoppix STD]], ...
 
* '''[[Tools#Forensics_Live_CDs|Live CDs]]''': [[DEFT Linux]], [[Helix]] ([[Helix3 Pro|Pro]]), [[FCCU Gnu/Linux Boot CD]], [[Knoppix STD]], ...
* '''[[Tools:Document Metadata Extraction|Metadata Extraction]]''': [[wvWare]], [[jhead]], [[Hachoir | hachoir-metadata]], ...
+
* '''[[Tools:Document Metadata Extraction|Metadata Extraction]]''': [[wvWare]], [[jhead]], [[Hachoir | hachoir-metadata]], [[Photo Investigator]]...
 
* '''[[Tools:File Analysis|File Analysis]]''': [[file]], [[ldd]], [[ltrace]], [[strace]], [[strings]], ...
 
* '''[[Tools:File Analysis|File Analysis]]''': [[file]], [[ldd]], [[ltrace]], [[strace]], [[strings]], ...
 
* '''[[Tools:Network_Forensics|Network Forensics]]''': [[Snort]],  [[Wireshark]], [[Kismet]],  [[NetworkMiner]]...
 
* '''[[Tools:Network_Forensics|Network Forensics]]''': [[Snort]],  [[Wireshark]], [[Kismet]],  [[NetworkMiner]]...
Line 95: Line 118:
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
 
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 12:13, 21 April 2014

This is the Forensics Wiki, a Creative Commons-licensed wiki devoted to information about digital forensics (also known as computer forensics). We currently list a total of 712 pages.

Much of computer forensics is focused on the tools and techniques used by investigators, but there are also a number of important papers, people, and organizations involved. Many of those organizations sponsor conferences throughout the year and around the world. You may also wish to examine the popular journals and some special reports.


WIKI NEWS

2013-05-15: You can now subscribe to Forensics Wiki Recent Changes with the ForensicsWiki FeedBurner Feed

Featured Forensic Research

May 2014

Hurley, Ryan, Prusty, Swagatika, Soroush, Hamed, Walls, Robert J., Albrecht, Jeannie, Cecchet, Emmanuel, Levine, Brian Neil, Liberatore, Marc, Lynn, Brian, Wolak, Janis - Measurement and Analysis of Child Pornography Trafficking on P2P Networks
Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web pp. 631--642, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland,2013
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2488388.2488444
Bibtex
Author : Hurley, Ryan, Prusty, Swagatika, Soroush, Hamed, Walls, Robert J., Albrecht, Jeannie, Cecchet, Emmanuel, Levine, Brian Neil, Liberatore, Marc, Lynn, Brian, Wolak, Janis
Title : Measurement and Analysis of Child Pornography Trafficking on P2P Networks
In : Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web -
Address : Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
Date : 2013

Peer-to-peer networks are the most popular mechanism for the criminal acquisition and distribution of child pornography (CP). In this paper, we examine observations of peers sharing known CP on the eMule and Gnutella networks, which were collected by law enforcement using forensic tools that we developed. We characterize a year's worth of network activity and evaluate different strategies for prioritizing investigators' limited resources. The highest impact research in criminal forensics works within, and is evaluated under, the constraints and goals of investigations. We follow that principle, rather than presenting a set of isolated, exploratory characterizations of users.

First, we focus on strategies for reducing the number of CP files available on the network by removing a minimal number of peers. We present a metric for peer removal that is more effective than simply selecting peers with the largest libraries or the most days online. Second, we characterize six aggressive peer subgroups, including: peers using Tor, peers that bridge multiple p2p networks, and the top 10% of peers contributing to file availability. We find that these subgroups are more active in their trafficking, having more known CP and more uptime, than the average peer. Finally, while in theory Tor presents a challenge to investigators, we observe that in practice offenders use Tor inconsistently. Over 90% of regular Tor users send traffic from a non-Tor IP at least once after first using Tor. (See also Past Selected Articles)

Featured Article

Forensic Linux Live CD issues
Forensic Linux Live CD distributions are widely used during computer forensic investigations. Currently, many vendors of such Live CD distributions state that their Linux do not modify the contents of hard drives or employ "write protection." Testing indicates that this may not always be the case. Read More...


Topics



You can help! We have a list of articles that need to be expanded. If you know anything about any of these topics, please feel free to chip in.