Difference between pages "Talk:Carver 2.0 Planning Page" and "Template:Deprecated Software"

From ForensicsWiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
(LGPL discussion)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
License: have we even discussed a license yet?  Who chose it?  I'm not terribly opposed to a 3-clause BSD, but...? - [[User:RB|RB]] 00:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
+
<div style="border:1px solid #aaaaaa; color:#000000; background-color:#ffeeff; text-align:center;">
 +
<table border="0" align="center"><tr><td>
 +
[[Image:40px-Ambox warning pn.png]]
 +
</td><td>
 +
'''This tool is deprecated.'''
 +
<br>
 +
The tool that this page describes is deprecated and is no longer under active development.<br>
 +
Further information might be found on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|discussion page]].
 +
</td></tr></table></div>
  
[[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] I prefer the LPGL it's restricts the usage of the code somewhat more. When its integrated in other (closed source) tooling which is published, they must publish that the tool uses this code.
+
[[Category:Deprecated tools]]
 
+
:: LGPL?
+
:: [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 19:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
+
:: [[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] GNU Library or "Lesser" General Public License (LGPL) (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical)
+
:::: ''Joachim I prefer the LPGL'' :) [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 19:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
+
:::::: [[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] To quote Homer Simpson "Doh!"
+
:: Agreed.  I sit on the fence between BSD and GPL: the business half of me agrees that open licensing should place as few restrictions or qualifications as possible, whereas the idealist/OSS side wants to ensure the project's freedom.  The LGPL is a more reasonable balance, encouraging widespread use but ensuring modifications' freedom.
+

Latest revision as of 09:33, 28 July 2012

40px-Ambox warning pn.png

This tool is deprecated.
The tool that this page describes is deprecated and is no longer under active development.
Further information might be found on the discussion page.