Difference between revisions of "Talk:Foremost"

From ForensicsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: >Foremost's authors have recommended that practitioners use Scalpel instead of Foremost. I think this was in the past, but foremost is still being maintained and developed and may yield e...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
>Foremost's authors have recommended that practitioners use Scalpel instead of Foremost.  
 
>Foremost's authors have recommended that practitioners use Scalpel instead of Foremost.  
 
I think this was in the past, but foremost is still being maintained and developed and may yield even better results than scalpel today. --[[User:Jr|Jr]] 14:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 
I think this was in the past, but foremost is still being maintained and developed and may yield even better results than scalpel today. --[[User:Jr|Jr]] 14:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
: As one of the original developers of Foremost I'm curious why you think it's better than [[Scalpel]]. The last update to Foremost was in October 2008. As far as I know [[Nick Mikus]] would be the only person maintaining it. Perhaps you should ask him what the status is. [[User:Jessek|Jessek]] 17:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:53, 20 April 2009

>Foremost's authors have recommended that practitioners use Scalpel instead of Foremost. I think this was in the past, but foremost is still being maintained and developed and may yield even better results than scalpel today. --Jr 14:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

As one of the original developers of Foremost I'm curious why you think it's better than Scalpel. The last update to Foremost was in October 2008. As far as I know Nick Mikus would be the only person maintaining it. Perhaps you should ask him what the status is. Jessek 17:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)