Difference between revisions of "Talk:MD5"

From ForensicsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: http://deepbyte.com/blog/2006/02/is_the_md5_hash_unreliable.html is broken.)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
http://deepbyte.com/blog/2006/02/is_the_md5_hash_unreliable.html is broken.
+
http://deepbyte.com/blog/2006/02/is_the_md5_hash_unreliable.html is broken. [[User:Cobalt2020|Cobalt2020]] 12:37, 6 June 2007 (PDT)
 +
 
 +
:Although this URL returns a 404 for me, there should probably be some verbiage about the weaknesses in MD5 on the main page. That being said, I don't want to scare people unnecessarily. Yes, it's possible to generate two different files that have the same MD5. But that doesn't mean MD5 is completely worthless for our purposes. [[User:Jessek|Jessek]] 16:21, 6 June 2007 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 19:21, 6 June 2007

http://deepbyte.com/blog/2006/02/is_the_md5_hash_unreliable.html is broken. Cobalt2020 12:37, 6 June 2007 (PDT)

Although this URL returns a 404 for me, there should probably be some verbiage about the weaknesses in MD5 on the main page. That being said, I don't want to scare people unnecessarily. Yes, it's possible to generate two different files that have the same MD5. But that doesn't mean MD5 is completely worthless for our purposes. Jessek 16:21, 6 June 2007 (PDT)