Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tools:File Analysis"

From ForensicsWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Are file hash analysis tools suitable for this page?)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
How about OS-specific "tools"?  Say, [http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man1/DeRez.1.html DeRez] under Mac OS X for resource fork meta data? --[[User:JohnJ|JohnJ]] 08:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 +
 
Perhaps a few introductory words as to what kind of file analysis is intended would be helpful.
 
Perhaps a few introductory words as to what kind of file analysis is intended would be helpful.
 
I was looking for a mention of the http://www.fileadvisor.bit9.com service, and could not decide
 
I was looking for a mention of the http://www.fileadvisor.bit9.com service, and could not decide
 
if it was suitable for this page, or if it should go somewhere else. It's a collection of
 
if it was suitable for this page, or if it should go somewhere else. It's a collection of
 
file hashes, very useful for deciding if a file is reasonably well known by its file hash.[[User:Athulin|Athulin]] 02:41, 29 October 2007 (PDT)
 
file hashes, very useful for deciding if a file is reasonably well known by its file hash.[[User:Athulin|Athulin]] 02:41, 29 October 2007 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 03:00, 4 September 2008

How about OS-specific "tools"? Say, DeRez under Mac OS X for resource fork meta data? --JohnJ 08:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps a few introductory words as to what kind of file analysis is intended would be helpful. I was looking for a mention of the http://www.fileadvisor.bit9.com service, and could not decide if it was suitable for this page, or if it should go somewhere else. It's a collection of file hashes, very useful for deciding if a file is reasonably well known by its file hash.Athulin 02:41, 29 October 2007 (PDT)