Difference between pages "Upcoming events" and "Talk:Carver 2.0 Planning Page"

From ForensicsWiki
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Calls For Papers)
 
(Consolidation)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<b>PLEASE READ BEFORE YOU EDIT THE LISTS BELOW</b><br>
+
License: have we even discussed a license yet?  Who chose it? I'm not terribly opposed to a 3-clause BSD, but...? - [[User:RB|RB]] 00:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Events should be posted in the correct section, and in date order. An event should NEVER be listed in more than one section (i.e. Ongoing/Continuous events should not be listed in Scheduled Training).  When events begin the same day, events of a longer length should be listed first.  New postings of events with the same date(s) as other events should be added after events already in the list. If a provider offers the same event at several locations simultaneously, the listing should have a single (ONE) entry in the list with the date(s) and ALL locations for the event. Please use three-letter month abbreviations (i.e. Sep, NOT Sept. or September), use two digit dates (i.e. Jan 01 NOT Jan 1), and use date ranges rather than listing every date during an event(i.e. Jan 02-05, NOT Jan 02, 03, 04, 05).<br>
+
<i>Some events may be <u>limited</u> to <b>Law Enforcement Only</b> or to a specific audience.  Such restrictions should be noted when known.</i>
+
  
This is a BY DATE listing of upcoming events relevant to [[digital forensics]]. It is not an all inclusive list, but includes most well-known activities.  Some events may duplicate events on the generic [[conferences]] page, but entries in this list have specific dates and locations for the upcoming event.
+
[[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] I prefer the LPGL it's restricts the usage of the code somewhat more. When its integrated in other (closed source) tooling which is published, they must publish that the tool uses this code.
  
This listing is divided into four sections (described as follows):<br>
+
:: LGPL?
<ol><li><b><u>Calls For Papers</u></b> - Calls for papers for either Journals or for Conferences, relevant to Digital Forensics (Name, Closing Date, URL)</li><br>
+
:: [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 19:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
<li><b><u>Conferences</u></b> - Conferences relevant for Digital Forensics (Name, Date, Location, URL)</li><br>
+
:: [[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] GNU Library or "Lesser" General Public License (LGPL) (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical)
<li><b><u>On-Going / Continuous Training</u></b> - Training opportunities that are either always available online/distance learning format (start anytime) or that are offered the same time every month (Name, date-if applicable, URL)</li><br>
+
:::: ''Joachim I prefer the LPGL'' :) [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 19:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
<li><b><u>[[Scheduled Training Courses]]</u></b> - Training Classes/Courses that are scheduled for specific dates/locationsThis would include online (or distance learning format) courses which begin on specific dates, instead of the "start anytime" courses listed in the previous section. (Provider, URL) (''note: this has been moved to its own page.'')<br></li></ol>
+
:::::: [[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] To quote Homer Simpson "Doh!"
 +
:: AgreedI sit on the fence between BSD and GPL: the business half of me agrees that open licensing should place as few restrictions or qualifications as possible, whereas the idealist/OSS side wants to ensure the project's freedom. The LGPL is a more reasonable balance, encouraging widespread use but ensuring modifications' freedom. [[User:RB|RB]] 16:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  
== Calls For Papers ==
+
== Consolidation ==
Please help us keep this up-to-date with deadlines for upcoming conferences that would be appropriate for forensic research.
+
  
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" align="top"
+
We've got a '''lot''' of good ideas here, but in interest of not stepping on anyone's toes, it's getting rather disjointed and hard to read. Is anyone willing to (or allow me to) try to consolidate them into some sort of coherency?  I'd like at least one of the admins ([[User:.FUF|.FUF]] or [[User:Simsong|Simsong]] to concur before anyone moves forward. I know the wiki way is to just let it grow, but even watching each addition I'm starting to have trouble visualizing where we are. [[User:RB|RB]]
|- style="background:#bfbfbf; font-weight: bold"
+
! width="30%|Title
+
! width="15%"|Due Date
+
! width="15%"|Notification Date
+
! width="40%"|Website
+
|-
+
|2010 Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law
+
|Feb 19, 2010
+
|
+
|http://www.digitalforensics-conference.org/callforpapers.htm
+
|-
+
|Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS) 2010
+
|Feb 28, 2010
+
|Apr 05, 2010
+
|http://dfrws.org/2010/cfp.shtml
+
|-
+
|2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security
+
|Apr 24, 2010
+
|
+
|http://ieee-hst.org/
+
|-
+
|2nd International ICST Conference on Digital Forensics & Cyber Crime (ICDF2C)
+
|May 01, 2010
+
|Jun 15, 2010
+
|http://www.d-forensics.org/callforpapers.shtml
+
|-
+
|2nd International Workshop on Security in Cloud Computing (SCC'2010)
+
|May 01, 2010
+
|Jun 07, 2010
+
|http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~ychen/SCC2010.htm
+
|-
+
|}
+
  
See also [http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/servlet/tool.search?q=forensics WikiCFP 'Forensics']
+
:: That's good idea, but it is important to consolidate without losing the ideas and opinions. I think it's better for this page to enter some "stable" branch. And then we'll move to the next phase. What do you think, [[User:Simsong|Simsong]]? [[User:.FUF|.FUF]] 18:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  
== Conferences ==
+
::: One option could be to break each major section into its own page so it can be properly discussed without clutter, then transclude each to this page. A dedicated namespace would probably be overkill, but since we're throwing out ideas should at least be mentioned. --[[User:RB|RB]] 19:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" align="top"
+
|- style="background:#bfbfbf; font-weight: bold"
+
! width="40%"|Title
+
! width="20%"|Date/Location
+
! width="40%"|Website
+
|-
+
|DoD Cyber Crime Conference
+
|Jan 22-29<br>St. Louis, MO
+
|http://www.dodcybercrime.com/10CC/
+
|-
+
|ShmooCon VI
+
|Feb 05-07<br>Washington, DC
+
|http://www.shmoocon.org
+
|-
+
|International Conference on Technical and Legal Aspects of the e-Society
+
|Feb 10-15<br>St. Maarten, Netherlands Antilles
+
|http://www.iaria.org/conferences2010/CYBERLAWS10.html
+
|-
+
|Third International Workshop on Digital Forensics
+
|Feb 15-18<br>Krakow, Poland
+
|http://www.ares-conference.eu/conf/index.php/workshops/wsdf
+
|-
+
|American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting
+
|Feb. 22-27<br>Seattle, WA
+
|http://www.aafs.org/default.asp?section_id=meetings&page_id=aafs_annual_meeting
+
|-
+
|RSA Conference 2010
+
|Mar 01-05<br>San Francisco, CA
+
|http://www.rsaconference.com/2010/usa/index.htm
+
|-
+
|CanSecWest 2010
+
|Mar 22-26<br>Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
+
|http://cansecwest.com/index.html
+
|-
+
|31st IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
+
|May 16-19<br>Oakland, CA
+
|http://oakland31.cs.virginia.edu/
+
|-
+
|AusCERT Asia Pacific Information Security Conference
+
|May 16-21<br>Kenmore Hills, Queensland, Australia
+
|http://conference.auscert.org.au/conf2010/index.html
+
|-
+
|Conference on Digital Forensics, Security and Law 2010
+
|May 19-21<br>St. Paul, MN
+
|http://www.digitalforensics-conference.org/index.htm
+
|-
+
|Techno-Security 2010
+
|Jun 06-09<br>Myrtle Beach, SC
+
|http://www.thetrainingco.com/html/Security_Conference_2010.html
+
|-
+
|7th International Symposium on Risk Management and Cyber-Informatics
+
|Jun 29-Jul 02<br>Orlando, FL
+
|http://www.2010iiisconferences.org/RMCI
+
|-
+
|Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS) 2010
+
|Aug 02-04<br>Portland, OR
+
|http://dfrws.org/2010/
+
|-
+
|2nd International Workshop on Security in Cloud Computing (SCC'2010)
+
|Sep 13-16<br>San Diego, CA
+
|http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~ychen/SCC2010.htm
+
|-
+
|2010 HTCIA International Training Conference & Exposition
+
|Sep 20-22<br>Atlanta, GA
+
|http://www.htciaconference.org/
+
|-
+
|VB2010 Fighting malware and spam
+
|Sep 29-Oct 01<br>Vancouver, BC, Canada
+
|http://www.virusbtn.com/conference/vb2010/
+
|-
+
|2nd International ICST Conference on Digital Forensics & Cyber Crime (ICDF2C)
+
|Oct 04-06<br>Abu Dhabi, UAE
+
|http://www.d-forensics.org/
+
|-
+
|Techno Forensics 2010
+
|Oct 25-26<br>Gaithersburg, MD
+
|http://www.techsec.com/html/TechnoForensics2010.html
+
|-
+
|2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security
+
|Nov 08-10<br>Waltham, MA
+
|http://ieee-hst.org/
+
|-
+
|}
+
  
== On-going / Continuous Training ==
+
:::: [[User:Joachim Metz|Joachim]] Separate the parts into topics. Have a discussion and an informational part per topic.
{| border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2" align="top"
+
|- style="background:#bfbfbf; font-weight: bold"
+
! width="40%"|Title
+
! width="20%"|Date/Location
+
! width="40%"|Website
+
|-
+
|- style="background:pink;align:left"
+
! DISTANCE LEARNING
+
|-
+
|Basic Computer Examiner Course - Computer Forensic Training Online
+
|Distance Learning Format
+
|http://www.cftco.com
+
|-
+
|Linux Data Forensics Training
+
|Distance Learning Format
+
|http://www.crazytrain.com/training.html
+
|-
+
|SANS On-Demand Training
+
|Distance Learning Format
+
|http://www.sans.org/ondemand/?portal=69456f95660ade45be29c00b0c14aea1
+
|-
+
|Champlain College - CCE Course
+
|Online / Distance Learning Format
+
|http://extra.champlain.edu/cps/wdc/alliances/cce/landing/
+
|-
+
|Las Positas College
+
|Online Computer Forensics Courses
+
|http://www.laspositascollege.edu
+
|-
+
|- style="background:pink;align:left"
+
!RECURRING TRAINING
+
|-
+
|MaresWare Suite Training
+
|First full week every month<br>Atlanta, GA
+
|http://www.maresware.com/maresware/training/maresware.htm
+
|-
+
|Evidence Recovery for Windows Vista&trade;
+
|First full week every month<br>Brunswick, GA
+
|http://www.internetcrimes.net
+
|-
+
|Evidence Recovery for Windows Server&reg; 2003 R2
+
|Second full week every month<br>Brunswick, GA
+
|http://www.internetcrimes.net
+
|-
+
|Evidence Recovery for the Windows XP&trade; operating system
+
|Third full week every month<br>Brunswick, GA
+
|http://www.internetcrimes.net
+
|-
+
|Computer Forensics Training and CCE&trade; Testing for Litigation Support Professionals
+
|Third weekend of every month(Fri-Mon)<br>Dallas, TX
+
|http://www.md5group.com
+
|-
+
|}
+
 
+
==See Also==
+
* [[Scheduled Training Courses]]
+
==References==
+
* [http://faculty.cs.tamu.edu/guofei/sec_conf_stat.htm Computer Security Conference Ranking and Statistic]
+
* [http://www.kdnuggets.com/meetings/ Meetings and Conferences in Data Mining and Discovery]
+
* http://www.conferencealerts.com/data.htm Data Mining Conferences World-Wide]
+

Revision as of 03:45, 2 November 2008

License: have we even discussed a license yet? Who chose it? I'm not terribly opposed to a 3-clause BSD, but...? - RB 00:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Joachim I prefer the LPGL it's restricts the usage of the code somewhat more. When its integrated in other (closed source) tooling which is published, they must publish that the tool uses this code.

LGPL?
.FUF 19:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Joachim GNU Library or "Lesser" General Public License (LGPL) (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical)
Joachim I prefer the LPGL :) .FUF 19:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Joachim To quote Homer Simpson "Doh!"
Agreed. I sit on the fence between BSD and GPL: the business half of me agrees that open licensing should place as few restrictions or qualifications as possible, whereas the idealist/OSS side wants to ensure the project's freedom. The LGPL is a more reasonable balance, encouraging widespread use but ensuring modifications' freedom. RB 16:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Consolidation

We've got a lot of good ideas here, but in interest of not stepping on anyone's toes, it's getting rather disjointed and hard to read. Is anyone willing to (or allow me to) try to consolidate them into some sort of coherency? I'd like at least one of the admins (.FUF or Simsong to concur before anyone moves forward. I know the wiki way is to just let it grow, but even watching each addition I'm starting to have trouble visualizing where we are. RB

That's good idea, but it is important to consolidate without losing the ideas and opinions. I think it's better for this page to enter some "stable" branch. And then we'll move to the next phase. What do you think, Simsong? .FUF 18:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
One option could be to break each major section into its own page so it can be properly discussed without clutter, then transclude each to this page. A dedicated namespace would probably be overkill, but since we're throwing out ideas should at least be mentioned. --RB 19:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Joachim Separate the parts into topics. Have a discussion and an informational part per topic.